I get questions from clients about the tax consequences of short sales and what happens if the lender files a 1099.
I listened to a great presentation by Ron Mason, CPA, today regarding potential tax traps for sellers/owners in short sale or other debt forgiveness cases. There are multiple factors to consider including possible exclusions that apply to reduce/eliminate taxes on cancellation of debt (“COD”) income including: bankruptcy or insolvency; qualified exclusion for principal residence (up to $2MM); qualified real property business; and qualified farm indebtedness.
As I understood from the presentation, if the cancellation of debt involves a principal residence, there is an exemption for up to $2MM of cancellation of debt income (“COD Income”). This is different and separate from the one-time $500k exemption from capital gain taxes upon the sale of a principal residence. The situation is different if a rental or second home is involved. Presumptively, no exemptions apply to rental property or second homes, except possibly the “insolvency test” the IRS prescribes.
Comments are requested regarding: whether or not the “insolvency test” applies to exempt COD Income for short sales of rental properties or second homes, please feel free to respond to this post.
Mr. Mason’s presentation was very informative. A few pertinent points/issues included:
(A) 1099 Issues: 1099’s are required to be filed by the end of February in the year following the year the COD Income occurred; however, there is no absolute deadline for filing a corrected 1099 thereafter if an initial 1099 is filed. If no 1099 is filed before the deadline, the lender cannot issue a 1099 in the next or subsequent years. Notwithstanding that no 1099 is filed, individual taxpayers have a duty to report COD Income (along with applicable capital gain/loss) regardless if a 1099 is issued by the lender or not.
(B) Grey Areas: There are a lot of questions involving lender’s issuing 1099’s on foreclosure judgments that have not be reduced to a deficiency money judgment, or situations where the lender has not foreclosed and/or the auction of the property has not been completed on the underlying foreclosure property. Arguably, if there is no auction there can be no 1099 issued because the auction sale in effect is the trigger that cancels the mortgage debt (but this does not prevent the lender from obtaining a deficiency judgment which is a separate proceeding). This issue could also come up where lender sues on the promissory note and obtains a judgment before the foreclosure auction occurs.
(C) Capital Loss and Non-Exempt COD Income. Arguably, a rental property could be short sold resulting in COD Income which could not be exempted, but based on the original cost of the property, there would be a capital loss. However, as I understood from today’s presentation, the capital loss could not be simply offset against the COD Income because capital losses are only offset against capital gains (if any are had in that tax year) and if there are no capital gains to offset there is a $3k per year limitation on the capital loss. Thus, in the example given, only $3k capital loss could be offset against COD Income (instead of the full amount of the capital loss).
One of the exemptions for COD Income is bankruptcy. But there are unanswered questions such as: what happens if a 1099 is issued and the debtor files bankruptcy the next year (after a 1099 is filed), or if the bankruptcy is filed after the 1099 is filed but before the tax return is filed. In the end, the tax consequences of short sales and deed in lieu situations need to be considered for anyone thinking about filing bankruptcy.
My Disclaimer: I am not a CPA nor am I a tax attorney, the above is merely my understanding from Mr. Mason’s presentation today. For more information, I would recommend going to Mr. Mason for his professional advice. Mr. Mason works with James Moore & Co. and can be reached in Tallahassee at Tel: (850)386-6184
Robert Gilmore, Esq.
The Gilmore Law Firm, P.A.
Web: www.bankruptcylawpractice.com